The court dismissed the writ petition holding it misconceived as the petitioner had alternative remedies of appeal and revision under U.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, rendering the writ against the Collector legally unavailable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42295 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramakant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 4.1.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing the Collector to cancel a lease deed when an alternative remedy exists.
Sushil Kumar Shukla
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
