Special appeal in an insolvency matter was called in revise. The appellant did not appear to press the appeal, and the matter was dismissed due to want of prosecution by the cited court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 257 of 2008
Appellant :- Chandrika Ram & Ohters Respondent :- The Official Liquidator, 33 Taskand Marg, Allahabad
Counsel for Appellant :- K.C. Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Mehta
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
it, we dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 8.1.2019 Manoj
Chandrika Ram & Others
The Official Liquidator
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
