The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn because the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41084 of 2005
Petitioner :- Shrinath Verma Respondent :- Kharpattu Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Satyanshu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,A.K.Singh,S.N.Singh
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Sri Shivendra Ojha, holding brief of Sri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner states that writ petition has become infructuous and, therefore, it may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 20.2.2019/vkg
Shrinath Verma
Kharpattu
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
