This is a brief order dismissing a writ petition filed under Article 226. The court held the petition not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005, for seeking information via appeal.
Writ petition dismissed as not maintainable due to existence of alternative statutory remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31653 of 2019 Petitioner :- Hakim Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and 2 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Ram Murti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable when statutory alternative remedy exists under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hakim Singh
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
