In a called-in-revise writ petition where the petitioner did not appear and the cause of action likely no longer survives, the court held the matter infructuous and disposed of it without deciding on merits.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6234 of 2004
Petitioner :- Satyendra Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Singh,K.D. Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Lallan Prasad Paul
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Manish Himwan
Satyendra Kumar Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
