This merged couple of stayed in writ petition for revision, filed by an industrial company against a state financial corporation, was dismissed as the petitioner was absent and no representations were made. The court held that the matter had become infructuous and dismissed it without deciding on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4091 of 2004
Petitioner :- M/S Sunil Packaginv Industries Respondent :- U.P. Financial Corpn. Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Mishra,Rohan Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.Gaur,Ravindra Singh,Rohma Hameed,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Manish Himwan
M/S Sunil Packaginv Industries
U.P. Financial Corpn.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
