In this writ petition, the petitioner sought mandamus to prevent the Sub-Registrar from registering a Sale Deed. The Court held the petition was misconceived as the Sub-Registrar had not yet completed the mandatory inquiry under Sections 34 and 35 of the Registration Act, 1908.
The writ petition to stop the registration of a sale deed was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30538 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Piyare Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J .
Order Date :- 23.9.2019 YK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to prevent the Sub-Registrar from registering a sale deed before his inquiry under Sections 34 and 35 of the Registration Act is completed.
Whether the petitioner was justified in approaching the Court before awaiting the outcome of proceedings by the Sub-Registrar.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Piyare
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
