Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2932 of 2014
Petitioner :- Chhatra Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Madan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Sri Abhishek Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for respondent no.4 is present.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 19.7.2019 S. Singh
Chhatra Pal Singh
State Of U.P.
3 Ors.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
