This judgment allows a withdrawal application. Consequently, the underlying writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
The withdrawal application is allowed; the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 2 of 2019
IN
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28728 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Kansal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R. P. Singh Parihar,Rajesh Shankar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28728 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Kansal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R. P. Singh Parihar,Rajesh Shankar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
The application, seeking withdrawal of writ petition, having been allowed vide order of date, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 8.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Ajay Kumar Kansal
State of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
