No one appeared for the petitioner. The court observed the writ petition became infructuous. The petition was dismissed without merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 44133 of 2001
Petitioner :- Devendra Pratap Kaushik Respondent :- Commissioner U.P. Housing And Development Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Pandey,V.M. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,A.S.Rana,Navaneet Chandra Tripathi,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 7.11.2019 KA
Devendra Pratap Kaushik
Commissioner U.P. Housing And Development Lko.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
