The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to non-appearance of the petitioner, despite prior illness slips indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26741 of 2010
Petitioner :- Nirmal Kunj Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- J.P. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.Rana,Madan Mohan
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition whereas Sri S.N.Shukla, learned Standing Counsel is present.
On earlier occasion, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri J.P. Pandey had sent illness slip, hence the writ petition was directed to be listed peremptorily in the next cause list and today again learned counsel for the petitioner has sent illness slip
It appears that neither petitioner nor, learned counsel for the petitioner is interested in pursuing the matter any further.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Nirmal Kunj Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
