Court held criminal miscellaneous writ petition infructuous due to efflux of time and dismissed it, vacating interim orders while allowing a lal application within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23976 of 2018
Petitioner :- Dharmendra And 06 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pradeep Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned AGA for the State is present.
Learned A.G.A states that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
However, it will be open for the parties to move appropriate application within six weeks' from today, if the matter still survives.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Dharmendra And 06 Others
State Of U.P. And 03 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
