The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed for protection of life and liberty. The court observed that grievances against the daughter-in-law should be pursued in the appropriate forum and dismissed the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24941 of 2019 Petitioner :- Manan Mani Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
This writ petition has been filed, inter alia , for the following relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to secure the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners."
Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused.
From perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioners are having grievance against their daughter in law, who is allegedly harassing her.
Suffice it to say that in case the petitioners have any grievance against their daughter in law, they may, if so advised, seek remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
With the above observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.8.2019
MLK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to secure the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners.
Manan Mani Tripathi And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
