Pahalwan Gurudeen Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21067 of 2019…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21067 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21067 of 2019 Petitioner :- Pahalwan Gurudeen Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hare Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dhananjay Awasthi,Rohit Pandey
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter has been taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Heard Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4, Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3, and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that the University has taken a decision not to bifurcate the seats in the B.Ed Course for the academic sessions 2019-21 on the basis of academic streams.
In view of above submission, the cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.7.2019 Pravin
Pahalwan Gurudeen Prashikshan Mahavidyalaya
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court