Disposed

Boby Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC19 Jun 2019WRIC/20373/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by two adults married to each other by free will against the State seeking protection to live together. Court directed authorities to allow them to live peacefully and provide protection against disturbances. Court clarified order does not validate marriage validity or block other legal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to live together; police to provide immediate protection against disturbances; certification of order required.

Boby Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 5

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20373 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Boby Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

¶5

1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2.Both the petitioners are present in the Court and they have been identified by their learned counsel. Both the petitioners appear to be major.

¶6

3.It is stated that the petitioner no.1 is major and her date of birth is 21.11.1991, as per High School marksheet. It is further stated that the petitioner no.2 is also major and his date of birth is 14.04.1993 as per High School marksheet. Copies of High School Marksheets of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 have been filed as Annexure-1 and Annexure No.2 to the writ petition respectively. It is also stated that both the petitioners have married with each other on 14.06.2019. It is further stated that no FIR has been lodged against the petitioners till date and the petitioners have married with each other by their own free will.

¶7

4.The petitioners claim to be adult and married to each other of their own freewill, and for that they are being threatened and harassed.

¶8

5.In the case of Deepika and another Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2013 (9) ADJ 534 , this Court having analysed the law laid down by the Apex Court as well as by this Court in the cases cited in the judgment, held that where a boy and a girl are major and they are living with their free will, then, nobody including their parents, has no authority to interfere with their living together.

¶9

6.In the said case the Court also relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2011) 6 SCC 396, it is apt to extract relevant paragraphs 28 and 29 of the said judgment, which reads as under :-

¶10

"28. ..... Often young couples who fall in love have to seek shelter in the police lines or protection homes, to avoid the wrath of kangaroo courts. We have held in Lata Singh case that there is nothing "honourable" in "honour" killings, and they are nothing but barbaric and brutal murders by bigoted persons with feudal minds. In our opinion honour killings, for whatever reason, come within the category of the rarest of rare cases deserving death punishment. It is time to stamp out these barbaric, feudal practices which are a slur on our nation. This is necessary as a deterrent for such outrageous, uncivilised behavior. All persons who are planning to perpetrate "honour" killings should know that the gallows await them.

¶11

29.Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the Registrars General/ Registrars of all the High Courts who shall circulate the same to all the Judges of the Courts. The Registrars General/ Registrars of the High Courts will also circulate copies of the same to all the Sessions Judges/ Additional Sessions Judges in the States/Union Territories. Copies of the judgment shall also be sent to all the Chief Secretaries/ Home Secretaries/ Directors General of Police of all States/ Union Territories in the country. The Home Secretaries and Directors General of Police will circulate the same to all SSPs/SPs in the States/Union Territories for information."

¶12

In view of the above, the writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that petitioners are at liberty to live together. No person shall be permitted to interfere in their peaceful living. In case any disturbance is caused in the peaceful living of the petitioners, the petitioners shall approach the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police or Superintendent of Police with a certified copy of this order, who shall provide immediate protection to the petitioners.

¶13

However, this order in no way expresses opinion about the validity of their marriage. This order shall not protect the petitioners against any action or proceedings pursuant to any F.I.R. or complaint case against him/her/them.

¶14

Order Date :- 19.6.2019

¶15

NLY

Boby Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Boby Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Satyama Bind and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

St. George Institute of Education for Women Vs State of U P and 2 Others

Khusboo and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Mohd. Shahid Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kripal Singh and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Chand Rathi (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others