Disposed

Jaywati Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC29 May 2019WRIC/18939/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court directed the respondent authority to expeditiously decide the petitioners' representation dated 4.2.2019 regarding the allotment of 5% developed land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, directing a decision within three months of providing the certified copy of the order.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondent no.3 to decide the petitioners' representation dated 4.2.2019 regarding 5% land allotment within three months.

Jaywati Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 21

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18939 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Jaywati Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶5

Present petition has been filed seeking a direction upon the respondent no.3 to allot 5% developed land in respect of the land of petitioners of Khasra no.400 measuring 1.671 hectare situated at Village-Kudauli Bangar, ParganaDankaur, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, which was acquired by notification dated 8.9.2008 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'Act') and declaration dated 16.9.2009 under Section 6 of the Act.

¶6

Case of petitioners is that they were Bhoomidhar with transferable right of the land mentioned above. The said land was acquired after the necessary notification was made under Section 4 and 6 of the Act by the State Government for acquiring the same for planned industrial development for respondent no.3. The said notifications were challenged by means of various writ petitions before this Court, and in one of the leading case of Gajraj and others Vs. State of U.P. and others , this Court by judgment and order dated 21.10.2012 disposed of all the writ petitions.

¶7

According to petitioners, they moved an application on

¶8

4.2.2019 for allotment of 5% developed land, which is pending consideration before the authorities concerned.

¶9

We have heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2 and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned Counsel for respondent no.3.

¶10

As no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending, with the consent of the parties, we direct the respondent no.3 to look into the grievance of petitioners and decide the representation of petitioners dated 4.2.2019 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶11

With the aforesaid observation, writ petition is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 29.5.2019 S. Singh

Jaywati Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaywati Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yadan Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Seth Ratan Lal Entertainment Private Limited Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anurag Upadhyay and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sumit Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sandeep Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ratan Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others