Held that the cause of action underlying the writ petition had expired. The petition was dismissed as devoid of any surviving cause of action. No pronouncement was made on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15562 of 2019
Petitioner :- C/M Sarvodya Shiksha Parishad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Pradeep Kumar Upadhayay, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 submits that the prescribed authority had passed final order on 07.06.2019. The order is made part of the record.
The cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 16.7.2019 Pravin
C/M Sarvodya Shiksha Parishad
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
