Disposed

M/S Shipra Estate Limited v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC29 Apr 2019WRIC/14817/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to the Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority, to decide a revised map application within three months. The Court explicitly reserved adjudication on the claim's merit.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority to decide the petitioner's dated 14.5.2018 application within three months.

M/S Shipra Estate Limited Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 39

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14817 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- M/S Shipra Estate Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Ali Ausaf Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh

¶4

Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.

¶5

Heard Mohammad Ali Ausaf, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Mahesh Narain Singh, learned counsel for respondents no. 2 & 3.

¶6

The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2, Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority to take action in compliance of the directions of an order of the State Government dated 28.09.2018 and 12.02.2019 for sanction and release of the revised map. It is stated that the petitioner is a Real Estate Developer and entered into an agreement with the Ghaziabad Development Authority on 08.01.2001 for development of plot no. 10 having an area 5,51,140.93 sq. meter situated at Indirapuram, Ghaziabad. It is also stated that the petitioner's company submitted its map for sanction and release but the FAR was enhanced upto 2.5 being chargeable and therefore, it revised the map in 2012 with no objection certificate of the residents as per the Apartment Act, 2010. The petitioner is stated to have filed its application with revised map to the Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority on 14.5.2018 under receiving of the same date, annexure-9 to the writ petition.

¶7

No useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending.

¶8

We, therefore, dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 2, Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 14.5.2018 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of the order in his office.

¶9

It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merit.

¶10

Order Date :- 29.4.2019 nd

M/S Shipra Estate Limited v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Shipra Estate Limited v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Unique Offset Vs Special Karyadhikari and Vibhagadhyaksha and Another

Raj Kumar Mishra Vs Purvanchal Bank through C.M. and Another

Chandrakant Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sharad Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sri Kashi Sarafa Atithi Bhawan Trust Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bindu Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others