A writ petition filed by M/S Unique Offset was dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6492 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Unique Offset
Respondent :- Special Karyadhikari And Vibhagadhyaksha And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Achyut Jee Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Paras Nath Rai,Tarun Agrawal
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Case called out. No one appears for the petitioner to press the writ petition.
Sri A.P. Paul holding brief of Sri Tarun Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Kirti
M/S Unique Offset
Special Karyadhikari And Vibhagadhyaksha And Another
B. Amit Sthalekar
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
