The single-judge High Court dismissed Writ-C No. 12435 of 2019 for want of prosecution as no advocate appeared for the petitioner to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12435 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sakir Parvez Respondent :- Authorized Officer, Union Bank Of India, Dev College Branch And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Agrawal
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Shri Atul Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent Bank is present.
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 o.k.
Sakir Parvez
Authorized Officer, Union Bank Of India, Dev College Branch
B. Amit Sthalekar
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
