It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that the proceedings under Section 4(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1953") were initiated for the second time in the villages in question namely Tabar Mustakam and Tabar Ahatmal. The petitioners/tenure holders of the villages in question were fully satisfied with the settlement/allotment of chaks in the earlier proceedings and as such they made a representation before respondent No.2 on 22.04.2019 with the prayer that petitioners and other villages are not interested to carry out the consolidation operation in the villages in question. On the aforesaid representation, a report was submitted by the Assistant Consolidation Officer, copy of which is appended as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition. It is further argued that since no action was taken by the respondent No.2 on the representation dated 22.04.2019, reminders were also made by the petitioners from time to time. Despite representation and reminders no action was taken, the petitioners have preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to direct the respondent No.2/Consolidation Commissioner, Lucknow to decide the aforesaid
