High Court allowed the withdrawal application of a writ petition and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Application for withdrawal No.16 of 2019 is allowed and writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 9489 of 1993
Petitioner :- Shiv Chand And Others Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.N.Kushwaha,Arvind Kumar Yadav,Rahul Sripat,Sunil Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Ashok Kumar,Rajendra Rai
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ashok Kumar for the private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners have already moved an application for the withdrawal of the writ petition supported by an affidavit.
In view of the above, as none of the respondents have any objection, the application for withdrawal No.16 of 2019 is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 4.12.2019 Pramod Tripathi
Shiv Chand And Others
Board Of Revenue And Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
