The High Court disposed of the writ petition without hearing merits, directing the second respondent to attend to the petitioner's claim for A.C.P. benefits within three months of receiving a certified copy of the order.
Direction to the respondent to attend to the petitioner's claim for A.C.P. benefits within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 953 of 2019
Petitioner :- Dr. Sarnath Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.B. Yadav, the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent states that the claim of the petitioner for grant of third A.C.P. benefits shall be duly attended to by the said respondent and disposed of in accordance with law and preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.
Accordingly and without going into the merits or otherwise of the claim of the petitioner, this petition shall stand disposed of in view of the statement made and noted.
Order Date :- 22.1.2019 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
Dr. Sarnath Pandey
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
