The petition was dismissed because the petitioner's services were already terminated without challenge on 07 January 2017, leaving nothing further to adjudicate.
Dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5953 of 2019
Petitioner :- Aditya Kumar Respondent :- District Judge, Fatehpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Dev Pandey,Gunjan Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Goyal
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Babu who appears for the respondents.
Sri Anil Babu learned counsel appearing for the respondents points out that the services of the petitioner have already been terminated on 07 January 2017. In the absence of any challenge to that order, nothing further survives in this writ petition which shall stand dismissed.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is directed to serve a copy of the order of termination dated 07 January 2017 upon the petitioner. It shall be open for the petitioner to take such further steps as he may choose and be advised.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 faraz
Aditya Kumar
District Judge, Fatehpur
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
