The High Court dismissed this infructuous writ petition in camera due to the absence of the petitioner’s counsel and extinction of cause of action.
Dismissed the writ petition and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50491 of 2002
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Mishra Respondent :- Director Of Education Basic U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
counsel for petitioner is absent.
Order Date :- 21.10.2019 AK
Ashok Kumar Mishra
Director Of Education Basic U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
