The Court allowed the present writ petition by relying on the identical controversy already decided in Writ-A No.713 of 2019 (Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.) on 03.04.2019.
The present writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5013 of 2019
Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Jaiswal,Basant Kumar Chauhan,Devid Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Vivek Jaiswal counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Praveen Shukla learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 3 and Mr. B.P. Singh for respondent no.2.
Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the identical controversy involved in the present case has already been decided by this Court in Writ-A No.713 of 2019 (Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.) on 03.04.2019.
In view of the same, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of (Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.).
Order Date :- 4.4.2019 Jitendra
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶6
Writ-A No.713 of 2019 (Reena Singh vs. State of U.P.)
Pramod Kumar Singh
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
