The High Court dismissed a writ petition that was called in revise due to inaction or lack of interest by the petitioner, with counsel missing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49822 of 2004
Petitioner :- Shayama Nand Chaudhary Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.B.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2019 PS
Shayama Nand Chaudhary
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
