The Court revised a judgment allowing a revision against a CJM's order. After perusing the record, the Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J., found no manifest error or illegality to justify interference. The criminal revision was consequently dismissed.
The criminal revision was dismissed. Any interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2254 of 1999
Revisionist :- Akhileshwar Shahi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shamimul Hasnain,Rekha Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower courts committed any manifest error or illegality warranting interference in the criminal revision.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
