In this criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., the Hon'ble Court perused the record as no one appeared. It found no manifest error in the Family Court’s order granting interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and dismissed the revision, vacating interim orders.
Revision dismissed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 546 of 1999
Revisionist :- Jeewan
Opposite Party :- Judge Family Court And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- G.S. Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court’s order granting interim maintenance to the wife warrants interference in a criminal revision.
Whether any manifest error or illegality exists in the lower court’s judgment under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeewan
Judge Family Court, Varanasi
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
