Rashmi Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed in 2006, deeming it infructuous due to the efflux of over 13 years. The court held that selection must have been made years ago, rendering the current prayer ineffective, but granted liberty for a recall application within two months.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for appointment and inclusion in selection process dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file a recall application within two months.