Petitioner failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10424 of 2006
Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secre. Deptt. Of Education And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.12.2019
Manish Tripathi
Ghanshyam Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru Secre. Deptt. Of Education
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
