The petitioner challenged a transfer order that was pending for several years. The single-judge court found no good reason to interfere with the transfer order under its discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 40283 of 2009
Petitioner :- Ramesh Babu Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Mishra holding brief of Sri Vijay Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.N. Mishra, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
This writ petition involves challenge to a transfer order, which is pending in this court from several years.
Transfer is an exigency of service. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was working on a transferable post.
In view of the aforesaid, I do not find any good reason to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this court and to interfere with the impugned transfer order. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.
Interim order, if any granted earlier, is vacated.
Order Date :- 5.12.2019 NLY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere with the impugned transfer order under its discretionary jurisdiction.
Ramesh Babu
State of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
