In a called-on-revise (COR) proceeding, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as it appeared to be infructuous due to the non-appearance of counsel for the petitioners and an apparent loss of cause of action.
The petition was dismissed. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32406 of 2010
Petitioner :- Madan Gopal And Others Respondent :- The Union Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Raj Counsel for Respondent :- Alok Kumar Rai,Manoj Kumar Sharma,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
Order Date :- 13.12.2019 AK
Madan Gopal And Others
The Union Of India And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
