In this dismissed writ petition, the court discharged the applicant due to lack of appearance by counsel and probable loss of interest or extinguishment of cause of action. The petition was declared infructuous without addressing merits. Any interim order remains vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18962 of 2010
Petitioner :- Maharani Ahilya Bai Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Badhotia Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 12.12.2019 YK
Maharani Ahilya Bai
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
