The writ petitioner appeared through counsel by videobrief only. The court recorded that no instructions were received and the matter had become infructuous. The petition was dismissed with vacatur of any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27239 of 2005
Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Kamla Singh, K.M. Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 25.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Deepak Kumar
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
