A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear even in a revised call. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24290 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ram Awadh Respondent :- Bhuwan Bhashkar And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- D.V.Jaiswal,Harsh Vikram,Saurabh Srivastava
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
None present on behalf of the petitioner even in revised call. Sri Harsh Vikram is present for the respondents.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 7.1.2019
skv
Ram Awadh
Bhuwan Bhashkar And Anr.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
