The writ petition was called on for a revision hearing. Since none appeared for the petitioner, the court held the matter infructuous and dismissed the petition, vacating any interim order previously granted.
The writ petition was dismissed and any interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23627 of 2008
Petitioner :- Km. Rashmi Saxena Respondent :- State Public Service Tribunal And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 9.12.2019 KA
Km. Rashmi Saxena
State Public Service Tribunal
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
