The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed in a court of original jurisdiction as infructuous or having become stale, with no petitioner appearing to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2835 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ravindra Maurya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mainuddin Ahamad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 7.12.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Ravindra Maurya And Another
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
