In this disposed writ petition, the court decline a hearing on merits due to absence of the petitioner's counsel and deemed the matter infructuous. The petition was dismissed without any reasoning or observation on the substantive contentions of the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18516 of 2008
Petitioner :- N.K. Singh And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Singh,V.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 9.12.2019 KA
N.K. Singh And Others
State of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
