The petitioner did not wish to press her writ petition. The court, noting the absence of objection from the respondents, dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18056 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Sudha Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Gaur,R.K. Ojha (Sr. Advocate) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Srivastava,Satyaveer Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
A request has been made by Sri Sunil Kumar Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not want to press this petition.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 6, Sri Satyaveer Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.7 and Sri Sailendra Singh counsel for the respondent No.9 have no objection for the same.
In view of the same, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
Order Date :- 26.11.2019 saqlain
Smt. Sudha Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
