In a writ appeal called on revise, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition as infructuous due to the absence of counsel, vacating any interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14012 of 1997
Petitioner :- Abhimanyu Chaturvedi Respondent :- State Public Service Tribunal And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 Arshad
Abhimanyu Chaturvedi
State Public Service Tribunal
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
