Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court held that a cognizable offence was made out based on the FIR allegations and dismissed the writ petition quantum for quashing.
Relief for quashing of the First Information Report denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18614 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ravi @ Rinku Kesharwani And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 26.11.2019 PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint in the First Information Report under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act discloses the commission of a cognizable offence sufficient to warrant its quashi
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ravi @ Rinku Kesharwani And 8 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
