PIL No. 2871 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous since the cause for filing the writ petition was no longer surviving; opposed counsel did not dispute this.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2871 of 2018
Petitioner :- Aqeel Ahmad Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Yadav,Akhilesh Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
On the matter being taken up today, it has been informed that the cause for filing of present Writ Petition no more survives and the same is liable to be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned Standing Counsel has not disputed the said situation.
Request made is accepted.
Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous . Order Date :- 3.5.2019 A. Pandey
Aqeel Ahmad
State Of Up
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
