A contempt application was disposed of as no order survived following the submission of a compliant affidavit by the opposite parties, discharging any notices.
Contempt application dismissed; notices discharged following compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1202 of 2014
Applicant :- Deen Dayal Opposite Party :- Dr. Roshan Jaikab D.M. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,G.D. Mishra,G.D. Misra
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the applicant in revised call. Shri K.R. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears for opposite parties.
From the affidavit of compliance filed on 26.04.2014, it is evident that the order in question has been complied with. Consequently, nothing further survives in the contempt application and the same stands disposed of. Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 2.5.2019 Manish Tripathi
Deen Dayal
Dr. Roshan Jaikab D. M.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
