The Allahabad High Court dismissed the Special Appeal citing barratry due to efflux of time. Additionally, the Court held the appeal was not maintainable as the impugned order was not a judgment, noting appeals under Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 lie only against judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 716 of 2019
Appellant :- Ashoka College Of Education Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pratik Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 1.7.2019 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Special Appeal is maintainable as the impugned order is not a judgment.
Whether the Special Appeal is dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
Ashoka College Of Education
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
