The High Court Court dismissed the first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC arising from the rejection of an interim injunction application. The court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it at the hearing stage under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC.
The appeal was dismissed at the stage of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 512 of 2018
Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar And Another Respondent :- Brahmdutt And 7 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pooja Agarwal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 8.2.2018 AK
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the rejection of the interim injunction application has merit before this Court.
Whether there is any manifest error in the order passed by the Court below rejecting the interim injunction.
Whether the recording of the plaintiff-appellants name in Khatauni grants them ownership of the disputed property.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Kumar And Another
Brahmdutt And 7 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
