The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear to contest it, despite sufficient notice for serving the notice upon the sole appellant to engage another counsel, leading to its dismissal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 557 of 1990
Appellant :- Sri Narendra Suri Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Other Counsel for Appellant :- Santosh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out.
In view of the office report dated 20.2.2019, service of notice upon the sole appellant to engage another counsel, is deemed sufficient.
No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. Learned Standing counsel is present.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019 Vivek Kr.
Sri Narendra Suri
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
