Criminal revision was dismissed as barred by limitation after the application for condonation of delay was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 94 of 2002
Revisionist :- Banarsi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Samar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order on Delay Condonation Application No.80514 of 2002
This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay in filing criminal revision, which is reported to be barred by 27 days.
Case called out in revise list.
None responds on behalf of the revisionist to press the application. Learned AGA is present for the State.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
On Criminal Revision
Since this criminal revision has been filed beyond time and application seeking condonation of delay has been dismissed, this criminal revision also stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
Order Date :- 6.3.2019 Vivek Kr.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Banarsi
State Of U.P.
Another
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
