The criminal revision was dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist failed to appear to present the matter despite being called out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 64 of 2001
Revisionist :- Smt. Sudha Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Jagdev Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Case called out in revise list.
None responds on behalf of the revisionist to press the criminal revision. Learned AGA for the State is present.
Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.3.2019 Vivek Kr.
Smt. Sudha
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
