In this criminal revision, the revisionist was absent at the hearing. The Court dismissed the revision for want of prosecution.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the revisionist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 297 of 2001
Revisionist :- Nandji Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Hafeez Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is not present.
The revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 8.7.2019 HSM
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
